Goodreads widget

Sam's books

Paper Towns
5 of 5 stars
I thought the book was very good. I think Looking for Alaska and The Fault in our starts were better though

goodreads.com

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Post 6: Book 3 Listicle

   The Scorch Trials by James Dashner, the second book in The Maze Runner series is becoming very popular: with the first book being turned into a movie in September and The Scorch Trials being released as a movie next year, this book is destined for fame. This book isn’t exactly a new book with new ideas though. Here’s 5 ways The Scorch Trials is similar to other books trending now.
 
1: Protagonist who saves the day
Thomas is very similar to other heroes such as Tris in the Divergent series. He is in charge of leading Gladers through the Scorch. Of course he doesn’t realize it at first and Minho is leading them, but after he sees a sign that says “Thomas, You’re The Real Leader” he figures he should start deciding what needs to get done.  Thomas then helps the Gladers reach the cure by fighting off Cranks and directing them away from danger.
 
2: Going through the impossible
Comparable to Katniss fighting in the arena, Thomas and the Gladers have to cross the Scorch, “the most burned-out section of the world”. While they are there, they’re faced with many challenges like Cranks (people who’ve caught the deadly disease the Flare). Their goal? Get to the cure because the creators gave them the disease. They need to get the cure within 2 weeks otherwise they won’t get it period. If they don’t get it they’ll all turn to Cranks.  

 
 

 
 
3: Love triangle
Brenda
Teresa
Resembling Twilight which has a love triangle between Bella, Edward, and Jake, during this book there is a love triangle between Thomas, Teresa, and Brenda. Thomas doesn’t know where Teresa is in the Scorch, but he meets a Crank named Brenda. Brenda flirts with Thomas and gives him little hints that she likes him. Throughout all of Thomas can’t help but think of Teresa.


Thomas

 
4: People die
The Fault in Our Stars is very comparable to this book. Similarly both books have people that die in them. In The Scorch Trials it isn’t a major character that dies, but some Gladers do die. One way to die in the Scorch is getting struck by lightning. For a Glader named Jack, when he got struck it did a lot of permeant damage, “shin, ankle, and foot obliterated by the burst of pure electricity from the sky”. There are other obstacles such as liquid metal balls attaching to your face and Cranks who want you dead so they can have your nose.
 
5: Dystopian society
Many books are now taking place in a dystopian setting. There’s Panem, a dystopian Chicago, and many others. This book’s setting takes place in the future after the flare has killed almost everyone. The people from WICKED are pretty much the only people that survived, and “exist for one purpose and one purpose only: to save the world from catastrophe”. They are doing trials such as the maze trial and the scorch trial to see what’s different about the groups of kids they’re testing the trials on. They want to figure out how each one of their brains work so they can save the world, but to Thomas and his friends the trials seem more like a punishment.
 
            While The Maze Runner and The Scorch Trials were both very good books, they’re also very cliché at the same time. To compare it to other young adult books is like comparing The Hunger Games and Twilight, different books with different ideas but some similar elements. Most people enjoy these dystopian books or series which is probably why a majority of books on the best sellers list seem to have similar topics or details.

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Post #5: How True Should Books Be?


          I think that if you are writing fantasy or magic realism the book definitely doesn't need any truth behind it. Realistic fiction should be something people could imagine but didn't necessarily have to happen. Historical fiction should keep the main ideas but if you add/change little details to add impact or make things seem more important I think that’s totally okay. Going off of that, I think if you’re going to categorize something as non-fiction it should be real, not something you make up. Especially memoirs. I just read the book Black Like Me and I’d be pretty mad to find out that some of it was made up like Frey’s was. A memoir is a story about what really happened in your life and you shouldn’t make it up otherwise it would be categorized as realistic fiction.

            I personally think that Shields is wrong about not needing lines to separate non-fiction from other types of fiction. If you’re doing research for a class or something your first move would probably be to go to the library and check books out about the topic. You’d probably choose non-fiction books because they’re the most reliable, but what if they just had all types of fiction in one area? You wouldn’t be able to tell at a glance what books were non-fiction, realistic fiction, or fantasy. It’d be a confusing mess of books. I honestly don’t like non-fiction books so I think it’s nice to categorize things as non-fiction or fiction. This way there would be no confusion about if something really happened or not. We don't need younger generation thinking things like Hunger Games happened, or that the Holocaust was just a story someone made up.